Fight Genie logo Fight Genie
UFC Fight Night · May 30, 2026Final

SongvsFigueiredo

13Bouts
0Locks
UFC Fight Night: Song vs. Figueiredo poster
Card complete. GPT 4/7 (57%)Results
RedBlue Bar: model avg Market KO Sub Dec
Main card
01
Main cardFinal: Yadong, SUB Guillotine Choke
Song YadongWINNER
Song
11-5UFC
28 yrs
VS
Bantamweight
Deiveson Figueiredo
Deiveson
15-6UFC
38 yrs
GPT
68%YadongFigueiredo32%
GPT Song Yadong 68% DecisionHIT
Why
GPTAt bantamweight, Song's size, youth, and pace advantage combined with superior striking differential (4.49 SLpM vs 3.01, +0.53 vs -0.38) and better defensive metrics (55% vs 51% striking defense, 72% vs 58% TD defense) should allow him to keep the fight largely standing and outwork Figueiredo over three to five rounds. Figueiredo's submission threat and opportunistic counters remain live, but his historically lower output, less efficient defense, and likely size disadvantage against a strong, physical Song make it harder for him to consistently win minutes without big moments or sustained top control.
Stats
02
Main cardFinal: Menifield, KO/TKO Punch
Zhang Mingyang
Zhang
3-1UFC
27 yrs
VS
Light Heavyweight
Alonzo MenifieldWINNER
Alonzo
10-7UFC
38 yrs
GPT
63%MingyangMenifield37%
GPT Zhang Mingyang 63% KO/TKOMISS
Why
GPTZhang's early-round power, pace (9.23 SLpM at 57% accuracy), and pressure striking are likely to overwhelm Menifield's lower-volume, more measured approach. Menifield's best path is mixing in takedowns (0.63 per fight at 33% accuracy) and clinch control, but his tendency to slow and get hittable late plus Zhang's youth, durability, and offensive output tilt the matchup toward Zhang finding a knockout, particularly in the first half of the fight.
Stats
03
Main cardFinal: Pavlovich, KO/TKO Punch
Sergei PavlovichWINNER
Sergei
7-3UFC
34 yrs16 mo out
VS
Heavyweight
Tallison Teixeira
Tallison
2-1UFC
26 yrs
GPT
72%PavlovichTeixeira28%
GPT Sergei Pavlovich 72% KO/TKOHIT
Why
GPTDespite Teixeira's inflated offensive metrics over a tiny sample, Pavlovich is the proven UFC-level heavyweight with elite early power, better-tested durability, and superior strength of schedule. Teixeira's extremely high SLpM and SApM suggest an aggressive but very hittable style that is dangerous against a fast, long puncher like Pavlovich, who excels at punishing entries and exchanges in the pocket. With no demonstrated wrestling threat from either man and Teixeira showing 0% takedown defense, this projects as a high-variance but striker-vs-striker bout where Pavlovich's cleaner mechanics, experience against top-5 heavyweights, and one-shot power make an early KO/TKO the most likely outcome.
Stats
04
Main cardFinal: Asakura, KO/TKO Punch
Kai AsakuraWINNER
Kai
0-2UFC
32 yrs
VS
Bantamweight
Cameron Smotherman
Cameron
1-1UFC
28 yrs13 mo out
GPT
72%AsakuraSmotherman28%
GPT Kai Asakura 72% KO/TKOHIT
Why
GPTDespite Smotherman's higher UFC striking volume and better defensive metrics, Asakura is an elite, proven finisher at the highest regional level with significantly more high-level experience and power. Smotherman's pressure and willingness to exchange create the kind of firefight where Asakura's counter-punching, timing, and shot selection historically translate into knockdowns and finishes. Over three rounds, the likelihood that Asakura finds a clean counter or combination as Smotherman enters is higher than Smotherman outworking him without getting hurt.
Stats
Prelims
05
Prelims
Muslim Salikhov
Muslim
7-6UFC
41 yrs
VS
Welterweight
Jake Matthews
Jake
15-8UFC
31 yrs
GPT
32%SalikhovMatthews68%
GPT Jake Matthews 68% Decision
Why
GPTMatthews is the younger, more durable athlete at this stage and has a more complete MMA game. His slightly higher output, better strike differential, and stronger offensive wrestling/submission threat give him more paths to win over three rounds. Salikhov remains dangerous with counter striking and timing, but his age, declining speed, and tendency to fight in low-volume pockets should allow Matthews to bank rounds with mixed striking and periodic takedowns, provided he avoids big counters.
Stats
06
Prelims
Alex Perez
Alex
8-6UFC
34 yrs
VS
Flyweight
Sumudaerji
6-4UFC
30 yrs
GPT
69%PerezSumudaerji31%
GPT Alex Perez 69% Decision
Why
GPTPerez is the more proven, well-rounded fighter with a strong wrestling base (2.04 TD avg, 46% TD accuracy, 77% TD defense) and solid defensive striking (58% StrDef, positive strike differential). Sumudaerji has the cleaner, longer-range southpaw striking (higher SLpM, 53% accuracy, 7-inch reach edge) but offers minimal takedown offense and only 66% takedown defense, which has historically been his vulnerability. Over three rounds, Perez is statistically more likely to mix leg kicks, pocket exchanges, and level changes to blunt Sumudaerji's volume and bank control time, while avoiding prolonged open-space kickboxing where Sumudaerji is most dangerous. Sumudaerji's finishing upside keeps KO/TKO live, but Perez's durability, experience against elite flyweights, and grappling edge tilt the probabilities toward a competitive but clear decision.
Stats
07
Prelims
Yi Sak Lee
Yi Sak
VS
Middleweight
Luis Felipe Dias
Luis Felipe
31 yrs
GPT
42%LeeDias58%
GPT Luis Felipe Dias 58% Decision
Why
GPTWith no UFC sample or clear statistical edge available, the lean is toward Dias based on the typical profile of Brazilian regional prospects, more developed grappling/wrestling and submission threats, against a debuting East Asian striker/grappler hybrid in front of a home-region crowd. In low-information spots, the more likely minute-winner with grappling depth and positional control upside is slightly favored, but the uncertainty keeps confidence modest.
Stats
08
Prelims
Ding Meng
Ding
31 yrs
VS
Welterweight
Jose Henrique
Jose
24 yrs
GPT
63%MengHenrique37%
GPT Ding Meng 63% Decision
Why
GPTBoth men show negative striking differentials and limited grappling, but Meng is more efficient everywhere: better strike accuracy (50% vs 43%), slightly lower output but far lower damage absorbed (3.87 vs 5.79 SApM), and a much smaller negative differential (-0.47 vs -2.34). Henrique's reach edge is offset by poor defense (38% vs 48%) and a tendency to be hit clean. With neither fighter showing proven finishing or grappling, this profiles as a mid-tempo striking match where Meng's cleaner shots and marginally better defense carry rounds on volume and accuracy.
Stats
09
PrelimsFinal: Haddon, KO/TKO Knee
Aoriqileng
4-5UFC
32 yrs
VS
Bantamweight
Cody HaddonWINNER
Cody
1-0UFC
27 yrs25 mo out
GPT
26%AoriqilengHaddon74%
GPT Cody Haddon 74% DecisionHIT
Why
GPTHaddon profiles as the much more efficient, higher-volume, and better-defending all-rounder. His SLpM is roughly double with superior accuracy and a massive positive strike differential, while Aoriqileng is negative in that metric and absorbs more than he lands. Haddon also owns a strong takedown-defense figure and higher submission output, which should blunt Aoriqileng's wrestling and clinch attempts. Over three rounds, Haddon's pace, cleaner entries, and superior defensive metrics point toward him out-landing Aoriqileng and mixing in takedowns without overexposing himself to big counters.
Stats
10
Prelims
Rei Tsuruya
Rei
1-1UFC
23 yrs15 mo out
VS
Flyweight
Jesus Aguilar
Jesus
4-3UFC
30 yrs
GPT
72%TsuruyaAguilar28%
GPT Rei Tsuruya 72% Decision
Why
GPTTsuruya's much higher takedown volume and efficiency (5.45 TDs per fight at 50% vs Aguilar's 1.75 at 33%) projects sustained top-time and control, while his superior offensive grappling output (2.5 subs per fight) forces Aguilar to defend rather than attack. Aguilar's better strike defense and 6-inch reach edge suggest he can avoid being dominated on the feet and survive scrambles, making a control-heavy decision for Tsuruya more likely than a finish.
Stats
11
PrelimsFinal: Hill, U-DEC
Angela HillWINNER
Angela
13-16UFC
41 yrs
VS
Women's Strawweight
Xiong Jingnan
Xiong
38 yrs
GPT
32%HillJingnan68%
GPT Xiong Jingnan 68% DecisionMISS
Why
GPTHill is a high-volume but low-finishing striker with a nearly even striking differential and modest wrestling. Xiong is an elite, defensively sound power-boxer in MMA with better shot selection, heavier hands, and strong takedown defense from strawweight title-level competition. Over three rounds in Asia, Xiong's cleaner boxing, superior power, and stronger ringcraft should edge Hill's volume and clinch work, but Hill's durability and cardio make a finish less likely.
Stats
12
Prelims
Zhu Kangjie
Zhu
0-1UFC
30 yrs18 mo out
VS
Featherweight
Ramon Taveras
Ramon
1-2UFC
32 yrs
GPT
37%KangjieTaveras63%
GPT Ramon Taveras 63% Decision
Why
GPTTaveras brings higher offensive volume and proven durability, while Zhu's numbers are inflated by a small sample and a low-paced style. Taveras' pressure and output should win rounds despite a negative strike differential, as Zhu's low SLpM and modest wrestling volume make it unlikely he can consistently slow the fight down or bank control time. Taveras' 100% takedown defense and southpaw stance reduce Zhu's clearest path, making a competitive but clear decision for Taveras the most likely outcome.
Stats
13
PrelimsFinal: Amorim, SUB Armbar
Loma Lookboonmee
Loma
7-3UFC
30 yrs
VS
Women's Strawweight
Jaqueline AmorimWINNER
Jaqueline
4-2UFC
30 yrs
GPT
69%LookboonmeeAmorim31%
GPT Loma Lookboonmee 69% DecisionMISS
Why
GPTLookboonmee's superior defensive wrestling, clinch balance, and high-percentage Muay Thai striking should allow her to survive Amorim's early submission threats, gradually take over with volume and body/leg attacks, and bank rounds as Amorim's grappling explosiveness fades after the first. Amorim is extremely dangerous early on the mat, but her low takedown accuracy, historically poor takedown defense, and tendency to slow down in extended fights favor Loma over three rounds.
Stats