Rating from every UFC fight since 1994. 1500 average, 1700 elite. 100 points is about a 64% favorite.
* Under five UFC fights.
UFC Fight Night · November 7, 20264 days out
BonfimvsBrady
14Bouts
13Agree
1Splits
1Locks
The Genie's read
Favorites line up, but the price is the only edge
Good card to bet
The market and both models back the same favorites across most of this card, led by Suarez's wrestling. The top heavyweight bout has no line. Several debutants are hard to read, and one bout has lost its opponent. Both models and the market agree on several fairly priced favorites, though the record shows the models only match the price, not beat it.
The bets
Tatiana SuarezMarket, Elo and both models agree; her wrestling path is clear and proven.
Karine SilvaEverything agrees, and her recent losses came against higher-ranked opposition.
Elijah SmithModels sit on the market; Smith's takedowns attack Grant's weak defense.
Bashi vs Brennan is off; treat any pick there as void.Models add nothing beyond the price; keep stakes small.Count Suarez's takedown attempts against Jandiroba's defense.Walker's chin after two recent knockout losses.Parsons' timing after more than three years away.
By claude-opus-5-5.
Tonight's locksBoth models 75%+ on the same fighter
Walker's recent knockout losses against Cortes Acosta's volume; no line, watch only.
Short notice
This heavyweight bout was put together about nine days out as the new main event after Sean Brady pulled out of his welterweight headliner with Gabriel Bonfim. Reports from October 29, 30 say Brady withdrew with a staph infection, and Bonfim is off the card and expected to be rebooked.
Why
CLAUDEThere is no market line for this fight, so the priors are Elo and the matchup. Elo has Walker at 53%, but Cortes Acosta's rating is provisional. It is built on only 4 rated fights, and both of his recent losses were clear decisions to elite heavyweights, Volkov and Blaydes. Neither man finished him. Before those losses he knocked out Delija, Gaziev and Derrick Lewis in a row, and none of those fights went past round 2. He lands 5.34 significant strikes per minute and absorbs 3.63, a +1.71 margin. Walker lands 3.87 and absorbs 3.12, a +0.75 margin, and his 44% strike defense is a real weakness. Walker is a natural light heavyweight who has only one heavyweight fight: a first-round knee KO of Mick Parkin, who is unranked. Cortes Acosta weighs about 260 lb and is a far heavier, more durable puncher. Walker has been knocked out by Ankalaev and Oezdemir at 205 lb, so his chin is the most important variable here, and now he takes heavyweight power on it. Walker's edges are a 4-inch reach advantage, his 6'6" frame and unpredictable knees and spinning strikes. That makes a sudden early finish his clearest path. This is also a short-notice five-round main event. Walker comes back only 5 weeks after his last fight, and his cardio has faded in long fights before. Cortes Acosta just went 15 minutes twice against top-5 opposition. The longer the fight goes, the more it favors Cortes Acosta's volume and durability. Walker is live early, so confidence stays modest.
GPTCortes Acosta's higher striking volume and stronger striking defense offer a narrow advantage against Walker, whose recent history includes two knockout losses. Cortes Acosta's three knockout wins preceded decision losses to Blaydes and Volkov, tempering confidence without showing the same recent stoppage vulnerability. Walker's reach advantage, accuracy and heavyweight debut knockout remain substantial threats. Elo favors Walker at 53%, but Cortes Acosta's rating is provisional. The reported short-notice five-round booking adds uncertainty for both. Event-date turnarounds are 56 and 35 days, respectively, so neither faces prolonged inactivity. Conflicting records and Walker's limited heavyweight sample keep this close. Method percentages are conditional on Cortes Acosta winning.
Suarez's relentless takedowns; Jandiroba must stay upright and force scrambles.
Why
CLAUDEThe market (Suarez 60% de-vigged) and Elo (57%) agree, and the matchup evidence supports a small move toward Suarez. Her wrestling volume is elite: 6.2 takedowns per 15 minutes at 61% accuracy, and no opponent has completed a takedown on her. Jandiroba averages 2.29 takedowns at only 34% accuracy and is unlikely to dictate where the fight happens. On the feet Suarez is also clearly better: 4.27 strikes landed per minute at 63% accuracy and 1.38 absorbed, vs Jandiroba's 2.12 landed at 38% and 2.73 absorbed. The common opponents favor Suarez. She is 3-0 against Godinez, Lemos and Esparza. Jandiroba is 2-1 against them, losing to Esparza. Jandiroba still has a real path. She is a high-level BJJ player who averages 1.7 submission attempts per 15 minutes and armbarred Lemos. Suarez's offense often involves front headlocks and guillotines, which can give up scrambles. Jandiroba has also never been finished in her UFC losses (decisions to Dern and Esparza). That durability and sub defense lower Suarez's finishing chances, even though she submitted Godinez, Andrade and De La Rosa. The likely fight is Suarez winning takedowns and controlling from top while staying out of leg-lock and armbar setups, which points to a decision. The layoffs are about equal (204 vs 211 days), and there is no fight-week news.
GPTSuarez's supplied 60% de-vigged market probability is supported by the opponent-adjusted Elo estimate of 57%. Her higher takedown rate and accuracy favor securing top position, while her positive striking differential supports a scoring advantage without establishing superior standalone striking. Jandiroba's 73% takedown defense and higher submission-attempt average make prolonged grappling competitive and favor a decision over a confident finish prediction. Both are 2-1 across their latest three enriched results; Suarez's stronger common-opponent history offers additional support. Reported layoffs of 204 and 211 days provide no meaningful separation, and Suarez's older extended absences have been followed by multiple appearances. Jandiroba's structured history contains omissions and duplicates, so the enriched log takes precedence. No supplied news warrants moving off the market. Round assumes three scheduled rounds; method probabilities are conditional on Suarez winning.
Smith's takedowns against Grant's shaky defense, after a long layoff for Smith.
Why
CLAUDEThe market has Smith at 66% de-vigged. Elo has him at only 53%, but his rating is provisional (2 rated UFC fights), so it understates a prospect who is still rising (+40 trend). The gap between the two priors comes from Smith's small sample, not from evidence against him, so I stay near the market with slight caution. Smith is 24 and 4-0 since his Contender Series fight: decisions over Aaron Tau and Vince Morales, a slam TKO of Kazama, and a rear-naked choke of SuYoung You. That shows growth into finishing in all phases. Grant turns 41 next month. He is a durable, high-volume decision fighter (4.77 strikes landed per minute) whose last four wins all went to decision. His 61% takedown defense is a weakness against Smith's 2.98 takedowns per 15 minutes at 53%. Grant was also choked out by Jourdain in round 1 in 2025, which shows submission vulnerability in scrambles. Grant does have real edges. His strike defense (55%) is better than Smith's (46%), and he can win a three-round volume fight if Smith's wrestling stalls. That keeps Grant live as an underdog. Grant is hard to finish, so a Smith decision built on takedowns and control is the most likely result. A late submission is the second-most likely.
GPTSmith starts at the supplied 66% market probability. His higher takedown rate and accuracy offer a credible route against Grant's 61% takedown defense, with submissions providing another threat. Grant's higher striking volume and stronger striking defense keep this competitive. Elo favors Smith only 53%; its provisional two-fight sample limits its weight, but the disagreement and inconsistent fight logs justify trimming confidence to 64%. Smith's recent finishes support his grappling threat without establishing superiority against stronger opposition. Grant's recent decision wins favor a distance outcome. Reported layoffs of 190 and 232 days are below the material-risk threshold. Method percentages are conditional on Smith winning.
Turman returns after nearly three years on a skid; Ko's defense should tell.
Why
CLAUDEThe market makes Ko an 83% favorite. Elo has him at 61%, but his rating is provisional (2 rated fights) and leaves out the 1,065-day layoff on Turman's side, so I side with the market and shade it down only slightly. Turman is 3-6 in the UFC and has lost three straight: decisions to Petroski and Randy Brown, then a second-round RNC loss to Jared Gooden in December 2023. He has not fought in almost three years, which is far beyond the ~450-day point where rust and possible injury become a real risk. His defensive numbers are weak for a fight against Ko: 45% striking defense, 4.17 SApM and only 42% takedown defense. Ko is a composed southpaw who wins on control. Over his last four bouts he went 3-1 with every result a unanimous decision. He lands 3.6 SLPM at 51% accuracy, absorbs 3.33, and adds 2 takedowns per fight. His most likely path is to win the striking exchanges at range, mix in takedowns against Turman's leaky takedown defense, and keep top control without giving up scrambles. The main danger is Turman's guard. He averages 0.8 submission attempts per 15 minutes and armbarred Cirkunov, so if Ko gets careless on top or Turman lands a sweep, a submission upset is possible. The Lebosnoyani decision loss in July shows Ko can be out-pointed by a fighter who matches his pace. That is a worry about his ceiling, not a sign he will lose to a fighter coming off a three-fight skid and a long layoff. Turman also looked depleted at welterweight against Gooden, after spending most of his career at middleweight, so the weight cut after a long layoff is another concern for him. Ko is 13-3 and has never been finished in the UFC, so I expect a clear but grinding decision. I have Ko at 79%, a few points below the market, because the market cannot see Turman's submission threat any better than I can and the Lebosnoyani loss lowers my read of Ko's ceiling.
GPTKo is the pick near the supplied 83% market baseline. Elo gives him only 61%, but his rating is provisional and its undefeated snapshot omits the latest logged loss, limiting its reliability. His better striking defense and positive striking differential favor winning rounds against Turman, whose three consecutive losses and layoff exceeding 1,000 days add substantial uncertainty. Ko's two-fight statistical sample warrants a modest confidence reduction. Turman's submission threat against Ko's 50% takedown defense remains an upset route. All four of Ko's listed recent bouts went to decision. Method percentages are conditional on Ko winning.
Elekana's submission threat against a favorite with a thin, leaky striking sample.
Why
CLAUDEThe market makes Fernando a 69% favorite, while Elo calls this a coin flip (1526 vs 1524, both provisional). I lean toward the market's pick but cut it by about 9 points, because the UFC results so far favor Elekana. Elekana is 3-1 in the UFC. He lost to Bogdan Guskov by guillotine, then beat Ibo Aslan by unanimous decision and submitted Kevin Christian (R1) and Junior Tafa (R2), both by rear-naked choke. He is a 6'3" southpaw who closes out once he reaches the back. Fernando has one UFC fight: a third-round knee KO of Rafael Tobias in August 2026, after a decision loss on DWCS in 2023. The stats from that fight are a 1-fight sample but point the same way. He landed 1.87 significant strikes per minute and absorbed 4.73 (38% striking defense), so he was clearly losing the volume battle before he found the finish. The 0% takedown defense recorded in that fight is also a warning sign against a back-taker like Elekana. Elekana's striking and grappling stats are missing from the database (no data, not a lack of skill), so I am not citing them either way. The market is probably pricing Fernando's 14-3 regional record, his 80-inch reach (3 inches more than Elekana) and his knockout power, and treating Elekana's wins over Christian and Tafa as wins over weak opposition. Those wins came against modest opponents, and Elekana's best opponent, Guskov, finished him. Without concrete fight-week news against Fernando, I am not going to pick the underdog. Still, the stats from his only UFC fight are the specific thing the market seems to be underweighting, so my confidence is modest. Fernando's likely path is to use his reach behind a long jab and kicks, punish Elekana's entries with knees as he did against Tobias, and stop takedowns or scramble back up. Elekana's path is to get to the clinch, find the back during scrambles and finish with the choke.
GPTFernando's 69% de-vigged market probability anchors the pick. Reduce to 64% because Elekana's consecutive submission wins present a credible threat and Fernando's limited striking sample shows more strikes absorbed than landed. Elo suggests 50/50, but both ratings are provisional and deserve less weight than the market. Fernando's recent knee knockout supports the stoppage prediction, although method confidence is limited. Elekana's roughly nine-month absence versus Fernando's three months modestly favors Fernando's activity; neither exceeds the 450-day risk threshold. Missing Elekana statistics and inconsistent fight records limit comparisons, and the supplied opposition evidence establishes no clear schedule advantage. Method percentages are conditional on Fernando winning.
Petroski's fading durability after back-to-back knockout losses.
ReplacementShort notice
This bout was put together about two weeks out. Petroski's original Oct. 31 opponent, Azamat Bekoev, withdrew after a reported anaphylactic reaction, and Kondratavicius had lost his own opponent, Wes Schultz. The new pairing was then moved from the Oct. 31 Moicano vs. Nolan card to the Nov. 7 card.
Why
CLAUDEThe de-vigged market has Kondratavicius at 73%, and Petroski's recent record backs that up. Petroski has lost three straight. Two of those losses were stoppages from punches (Cam Rowston in R1, Sep 2025; Cody Brundage, May 2026), and a 2024 TKO loss to Jacob Malkoun points the same way: his durability has dropped as the opposition got better. His career profile (3.13 TD/15, 86% TDD, 1.2 sub attempts per 15) is a control grappler's. But he lands only 2.75 sig strikes per minute and absorbs 2.99, so when he can't set up his wrestling he loses the striking exchanges. The data has a gap here. The pipeline flags Kondratavicius as a UFC debutant with null stats, yet the form log shows a UFC decision win over Antonio Trocoli in March 2026 after a DWCS KO of Djani Barbir. In practice he has one UFC fight and a 9-1 pro record, so there are no meaningful per-minute numbers to compare. The 'short notice replacement' flag matters less than it looks. He was already in camp for a Nov 7 bout with Wes Schultz, and only the opponent changed, from a striker to a wrestler, about two weeks out. That change is the one real risk: he has had little time to prepare for Petroski's chain wrestling. I agree with the market's direction, but the debut flag caps me at 65 and his tiny UFC sample also argues for caution. This is about 8 points under the market, not a fade. The finish odds are split. Petroski's chin is now a real liability, but the Trocoli fight went the distance, and Petroski will try to slow things down with clinch and takedown attempts. Decision is the single most likely result, with a KO close behind.
GPTStart from the supplied 73% market probability for Kondratavicius, but cap confidence at 65% because his debut flag contradicts the reported UFC history and makes his statistical averages unreliable. Petroski's enriched log shows three consecutive losses, including two straight knockout defeats, supporting a stoppage lean. His established UFC experience and wrestling provide a credible upset route; Kondratavicius's listed wins do not establish comparable opposition quality. The late opponent change adds uncertainty, although Kondratavicius was already scheduled to fight November 7. Neither supplied layoff reaches the 450-day risk threshold. Method percentages are conditional on a Kondratavicius victory.
Debutant power against Petersen's wrestling; models split, no line, watch only.
ReplacementShort notice
Gabriel Lorenco's original opponent, Alvin Hines, pulled out with an unspecified medical issue, according to an October 8 report. Thomas Petersen was reported as the replacement on about October 25, roughly two weeks before the event.
Why
CLAUDEThere is no market line or Elo rating for this fight, so it is built from form and style, with a lot of uncertainty. Lorenco is a true UFC debutant: he is 8-1 and earned his contract with a KO of Charlie Cleveland at DWCS on Sep 1, 2026. He has no UFC stats, so nothing from UFCStats can be cited for or against him. He took the fight about two weeks out, replacing A. Hines. He fought only 61 days ago, so his conditioning should be decent, but he has had little time to prepare for a wrestler. Petersen is a southpaw control grappler (2.49 TD/15 at 42%, 61% striking accuracy, 4.32 SLpM vs 3.96 SApM) who wins by grinding. Every one of his recent wins is a decision (Mayes U-DEC, Guilherme Pat M-DEC, Usman U-DEC). His losses have been finishes: KO'd by Shamil Gaziev in R1, KO'd by Vitor Petrino in R3, and submitted by Valter Walker's calf slicer in July 2026. That makes three stoppage losses in his last five. The 100% TDD figure comes from a small sample of attempts and shouldn't be trusted. The fight comes down to whether Petersen can wrestle a fresh, power-punching heavyweight debutant before he gets caught. His record shows that against UFC-level heavyweights with power, he usually doesn't. The short-notice factor is real and works against Lorenco, mainly in rounds 2-3 if Petersen gets on top. I lean very slightly to Lorenco's power against Petersen's chin, but this is close to a coin flip, and Petersen by decision is about as likely as any single Lorenco outcome.
GPTPetersen's documented takedown production and UFC experience offer a narrow edge against a debutant reportedly accepting this matchup roughly two weeks before the event. His two recent wins came by decision, supporting a wrestling-led points victory. However, three stoppage losses in his last five fights expose substantial vulnerability, particularly against Lorenco's demonstrated knockout threat. Lorenco's debut designation overrides the conflicting UFC-record label; his supplied statistical averages are not reliable UFC evidence. Neither listed layoff is unusually long, and opposition-quality evidence is insufficient to establish a stronger advantage. Method percentages are conditional on Petersen winning.
Silva's takedowns against Fernandes' busier, sharper striking.
Why
CLAUDEBoth priors agree. The market has Silva at 59% de-vigged and Elo has her at 60% (1551 vs 1483, a 67-point gap, neither rating provisional). I see no matchup reason to move off that. Silva's skid looks worse than it is: her two straight losses were decisions to Maycee Barber and Jasmine Jasudavicius, both higher-ranked fighters than Fernandes, and she wasn't finished in either. The style matchup favors her. Silva lands takedowns well (72% accuracy, 3.59 per 15) and threatens submissions (2.2 attempts per 15). Fernandes has a 59% TDD, 0.67 TD/15 and only 22% takedown accuracy, so Silva should be able to set the range and the position. Fernandes is a southpaw striker with more volume (3.73 SLpM vs Silva's 2.67 at 35% accuracy), but she absorbs 5.56 sig strikes per minute, a -1.83 differential, and was stopped by Casey O'Neill in March 2026. If she keeps it standing at range she can win rounds on volume, and that is the path to an upset. Common opponent: both lost decisions to Jasudavicius, which tells us little. Silva's listed 0% TDD is a data artifact (no recorded attempts against her) and is not counted here. Fernandes's dataset is also messy: the Wang Cong result shows as a loss in one table and an RNC win in another. Silva's last five UFC fights all went to decision, while Fernandes absorbs a lot and has been finished, so a decision is most likely, with a late submission as the main finishing route. Confidence sits at 60, matching both priors.
GPTSilva's 59% market probability aligns with the opponent-adjusted Elo estimate of 60%, supporting a modest favorite despite her two consecutive losses. Her 3.59 takedown average and 72% accuracy provide a plausible advantage against Fernandes' 59% takedown defense. Fernandes offers greater striking output and accuracy, but absorbs substantially more strikes. Silva's five consecutive decisions favor a decision prediction over her career submission activity. Conflicting Fernandes fight logs and record totals limit confidence in recent-form comparisons. Neither reported layoff approaches the 450-day risk threshold, and no material fight-week news supports moving away from the market. Method probabilities are conditional on Silva winning.
Degli's grappling debut against Raposo's experience winning close decisions.
Why
CLAUDEThe market has Degli at 68% de-vigged. Degli makes his UFC debut off a DWCS rear-naked choke win over Paris Moran 40 days ago, so the debutant cap of 65 applies. His 100% finish rate comes from a single logged fight. Raposo has two straight wins (S-DEC over Allan Nascimento, U-DEC over Azat Maksum), but both were close, and before that he lost three in a row (two split decisions and an RNC loss to Jake Hadley on DWCS). His numbers point to a low-output fighter who stays close: 2.29 SLpM, 33% accuracy, a -1.03 strike differential and no submission attempts. His 1.94 takedowns per 15 minutes at 60% are his main way to win rounds. The problem is his 50% takedown defense against a submission grappler, plus the Hadley RNC loss as evidence he can be finished in scrambles. Degli's 15-3 regional record and finishing profile suggest he has the edge in grappling exchanges. Raposo is durable, though: four of his last five fights went to decision, so a clear decision is more likely than a stoppage. I see no specific reason to move far from the market and trim to 64 because of the debut cap and Raposo's experience in three-round UFC fights.
GPTThe supplied 68% market probability favors Degli; debut uncertainty lowers my estimate to 64%. His submission win over Paris Moran supports a grappling threat, but his statistical averages are not established UFC evidence. Raposo's two recent wins outweigh the stale form summary, and his UFC experience provides a stronger competitive benchmark. His four consecutive decisions suggest a finish is less certain than Degli's single recorded submission victory implies. Neither fighter has a concerning extended layoff. Method probabilities are conditional on Degli winning.
True coin flip: Delano's decision game against Magomedov's finishing threat.
Why
CLAUDEThis is a true coin flip: the market has Delano at 51% and Magomedov at 49%. The data flags both as having no usable UFC stats even though each has a recent UFC win (Delano U-DEC over Robert Ruchala, Magomedov a twister submission of Melsik Baghdasaryan), so I treat all stat fields as missing and keep confidence near 50. Delano (17-3) has won his last two by unanimous decision, including on DWCS. He looks like a volume striker who controls range and gets through three rounds. Magomedov (11-0) is the more dangerous finisher, with a KO on DWCS and a rare twister in his UFC debut, and the matchup model tags him as a grappler. The key question is whether Delano can keep the fight standing for 15 minutes. If he can, his proven three-round pace should win him rounds. If Magomedov gets to the mat, the finishing threat swings it his way. Nothing specific moves me off the market, so I take the slight favorite at 51 and note that a Magomedov finish is the main danger.
GPTI retain the market's 51% Delano lean because the supplied evidence does not justify an adjustment. Delano's two listed unanimous-decision wins support a decision prediction, while Magomedov's two finishes indicate a credible finishing threat. Both are flagged as UFC debutants, conflicting with the enrichment's UFC-record labels; their statistical averages therefore provide no reliable matchup advantage. Opposition quality cannot be established from the supplied records. The listed layoffs of 211 and 134 days are below the material-risk threshold, and no material fight-week news was found. This remains a highly uncertain coin flip. Method probabilities are conditional on a Delano win.
Nakamura's knee knockouts against a debutant with a knockout loss on record.
Why
CLAUDEThe market makes Nakamura a strong favorite at 76% de-vigged. Schmid is flagged as having no UFC data, so the debutant cap of 65 applies and holds me well below the market; the gap comes from the rule, not from disagreeing with the market. Nakamura is on a three-fight streak with a 67% finish rate, including two knee KOs (EoJin Park on Road to UFC, Sebastian Szalay in round 3 at UFC 325). His one UFC fight shows 5.22 SLpM, 43% accuracy, 66% striking defense and 83% takedown defense, though that is a one-fight sample. He is a southpaw (5'10", 70-inch reach) with a pressure clinch-and-knee game. Schmid (4-3) was knocked out by punches by Marwan Rahiki in his last fight in May 2026, so his durability is a real question. Nakamura's 274-day layoff is moderate and below the risk threshold. Schmid's thin record and recent KO loss favor a Nakamura stoppage, but Nakamura also went to decision against Kaiwen, so a decision remains a large share of the outcomes.
GPTThe supplied 76% de-vigged market favors Nakamura, supported by three consecutive wins including two knee knockouts. Schmid's recorded knockout loss supports a stoppage prediction, although opposition quality is unverified. Confidence is capped at 65 because Schmid is flagged as a UFC debutant and Nakamura has only one verified UFC appearance; enrichment record labels conflict with those completeness flags. Schmid's statistical fields therefore provide no reliable matchup evidence. His slight height and reach advantages offer a counterweight. Both reported layoffs are below the 450-day material-risk threshold. Method percentages are conditional on Nakamura winning.
Off as listed: Brennan withdrew with an ACL tear, no replacement named.
Injury news
MMA Junkie reported on Oct. 29, 2026 that Lucas Brennan pulled out of his Nov. 7 bout with Austin Bashi after a full-thickness ACL tear. No replacement opponent for Bashi had been named in the sources found.
Why
CLAUDEThis bout will almost certainly not happen as listed. On Oct. 26-29 Lucas Brennan said on Instagram that he has a full-thickness ACL tear, picked up in the last two weeks of camp, and withdrew. MMA Junkie and Wikipedia list the slot as Bashi vs. TBD with no replacement named. Treat this pick as void for grading and betting. If a replacement is named, re-run the bout with that opponent's data. For the record, the hypothetical matchup leans Bashi. He is a pressure wrestler from Dana White's Contender Series (DWCS). He won his DWCS fight against Dorian Ramos and his UFC fight against John Yannis, both by rear-naked choke, and he goes to takedowns and the back early. His UFC results are mixed: 1-2, with clear decision losses to Christian Rodriguez and Jose Delgado, so better wrestlers can neutralize his chain grappling. Brennan is 0-1 in the UFC after a decision loss to Francis Marshall at lightweight. He would have been cutting to 145 for the first time, and he is 4 inches taller at 5'10". Elo has them level (1482 vs 1479, both provisional, 50/50). Bashi's ground game and the unknowns around Brennan's weight cut only just lift Bashi above a coin flip.
GPTBrennan withdrew with a confirmed full-thickness ACL tear, and no replacement is identified. This is only a hypothetical prediction assuming both fighters are healthy; the supplied matchup is no longer scheduled. Provisional Elo estimates are effectively 50, 50. Bashi's documented submission wins offer a slight edge, but his decision losses and noisy one-fight statistics limit confidence. Brennan's missing statistics do not establish weaknesses. Conflicting record coverage further reduces certainty. Neither listed layoff exceeds 450 days. Method probabilities describe the hypothetical outcome conditional on Bashi winning.
Cachoeira absorbs too much at 38; Milosevic should find the finish.
Why
CLAUDEThe sportsbook line makes Milosevic about a 77% favourite (-425 vs +325, de-vigged), and the evidence backs the market's side. Cachoeira is 38 and on a three-fight losing streak: armbarred by Chelsea Chandler (June 2026), outpointed by Klaudia Sygula (Feb. 2026) and knocked out in round 1 by Joselyne Edwards (Aug. 2025). Her career defensive numbers are among the worst at bantamweight: 7.03 significant strikes absorbed per minute against 3.76 landed (a -3.27 differential), with only 43% striking defense. She also gets finished in every phase, having lost by submission to Jasudavicius and Maverick on top of the Chandler and Edwards losses. Her only route is wild early power, which is how she knocked out Josiane Nunes in March 2025. Milosevic is 9-1 and knocked out Hailey Cowan in her UFC debut in August 2026, so she brings finishing power into a fight with a defensively porous, fading opponent. The dataset's debut flag and empty UFCStats line for Milosevic are stale, but she still has just one UFC fight. I agree with the market on direction and would put her near 75% without constraints, but the debutant/small-sample rule caps confidence at 65. The fight-week scouting found no news, so there is nothing to adjust.
GPTMilosevic is the pick from the supplied 77% de-vigged market baseline. Cachoeira's three consecutive losses, including a knockout and submission, reinforce concerns about her 7.03 significant strikes absorbed per minute and 43% striking defense. However, Milosevic's debut flag conflicts with the supplied Cowan victory; her UFC statistics cannot be treated as established evidence, and confidence is capped at 65. That single reported win provides limited evidence of opposition quality. Neither supplied layoff indicates prolonged inactivity. Cachoeira's knockout win over Nunes preserves a credible upset route, but her defensive vulnerabilities favor a Milosevic stoppage. Method probabilities are conditional on Milosevic winning.
Parsons' layoff of over three years against an active Souza; watch only.
Parsons returns after more than three years away from the UFC, which he puts down to bad training habits and lingering injuries; he says he now builds strength before high-volume training. No short-notice, replacement or weigh-in news was found for this bout.
Why
CLAUDEThere is no market line here, so this reads only the form and stats. The main factor is Parsons' layoff: 1,198 days since his round-2 KO of Danny Roberts in July 2023. That is far past the ~450-day threshold where ring rust and possible injury become a real risk, and he is now 35. His only UFC sample shows a near-even striking exchange (4.65 landed vs 4.89 absorbed per minute, 60% defense) with no takedown offense, so he is a pocket striker who will mostly stand. Souza is 9-1 and fought in May 2026, winning a split decision over Ding Meng in his UFC debut. The narrow margin tempers enthusiasm, and he was knocked out by Yusaku Kinoshita at DWCS in 2022, so he can be hurt. The dataset flags Souza as a debutant, but his fight log shows one UFC fight, so his statistical profile is still thin and unknown. With no Elo and both fighters on small samples, this is close to a coin flip. Souza's activity against Parsons' three-year absence is the only concrete edge, which justifies a slim lean. Both men profile as strikers, and Souza's recent fight went the full distance, so a decision is the most likely outcome. Parsons' power, shown against Roberts, is the main threat to that.
GPTSouza gets a narrow edge from his listed reach advantage and greater recent activity: 155 days since competing versus Parsons' 1,198-day layoff. Parsons' knockout of Danny Roberts supplies credible finishing evidence, but his two-win sequence spans widely separated appearances. Souza's recent split-decision win offers limited reassurance, and his previous knockout loss leaves a clear opening for Parsons. With Souza making his UFC debut and Parsons having only one UFC bout recorded, statistical comparisons are unreliable and opposition quality is insufficiently established. This remains close to a coin flip.
1