Gable Steveson vs Sean Sharaf
Heavyweight · Main card · UFC 331: Van vs. Pantoja 2
Who wins, by source
Each row splits one source's view of the fight. The dashed line is even odds. Where the models sit further from the market, they are claiming an edge.
Tale of the tape
Career UFC averages. Bars are scaled within each row, so compare left against right, not row against row. The stronger side is highlighted, and for strikes absorbed the lower number is the better one.
How it ends
Each model's split across the ways this fight can finish, out of 100.
The analysis
The data pipeline flags Steveson as having no completed UFC fights on record, while the enrichment log shows a KO win over Elisha Ellison at UFC 329 (Jul. 2026). Either way, the UFCStats per-minute numbers (16.29 SLPM, 71% accuracy) come from at most one bout and the 0% TD figures are empty fields, not skills, so this read leans on the -1800 market line, Steveson's Olympic gold-medal wrestling pedigree, and the 4-0 regional/UFC record with 100% finish rate. Sharaf is the more useful sample: both of his UFC bouts ended in Round 2 KO losses (Tafa, Asplund), he absorbs 15 strikes per minute against 7.41 landed (a -7.59 differential), and he has landed 1 of 9 takedown attempts while defending none. He returns off a 267-day layoff following a knockout, which historically compounds durability concerns at heavyweight. Sharaf's 6'3"/77" frame gives him 4 inches of height and 3 inches of reach, but Steveson's entries come from a chain-wrestling base that does not need to win the jab exchange. Expect an early takedown, top-position ground strikes, and a stoppage before the midpoint of the fight. Confidence is capped at 65 because of the debut/small-sample flag; the market's 90% is likely closer to correct, but the model cannot verify it from the available UFC data.
Steveson's higher striking output and accuracy match favorably against Sharaf's 15 significant strikes absorbed per minute and 42% striking defense, supporting an early stoppage. Sharaf's height and reach advantages offer some resistance. Missing sample sizes and incomplete grappling data limit confidence. Method percentages are conditional on a Steveson win.