Fight Genie logo Fight Genie
Back
UFC Fight Night: Walker vs. ZhangLightweightPrelims
RongzhuWINNER
Rongzhu
2-3UFC
25 yrsElo 1505
VS
Austin Hubbard
Austin
Hubbard
4-7UFC
33 yrsElo 1452
Final: Rongzhu by U-DEC
Who wins
Claude
60%
Rongzhu
GPT
65%
Hubbard
Elo
58%
Rongzhu
1505 vs 1452
Tale of the tapeUFC averages
5'9" Height 5'10"
72" Reach 71"
Orthodox Stance Orthodox
5.45 Landed / min 3.97
5.80 Absorbed / minlower better 4.10
51% Strike accuracy 42%
44% Strike defense 55%
1.85 Takedowns / 15 1.63
62% TD accuracy 28%
85% TD defense 68%
0.2 Subs / 15 0.1
How it ends
Claude: KO/TKO 25%Claude: Submission 15%Claude: Decision 60%
60%Decision
Claude calls Decision
KO/TKO 25%Submission 15%Decision 60%
GPT: KO/TKO 10%GPT: Submission 5%GPT: Decision 85%
85%Decision
GPT calls Decision
KO/TKO 10%Submission 5%Decision 85%
Formnewest first
Rongzhu195 days out
W
Kody Steele
U-DEC · 2025-02-08
L
Chris Padilla
KO/TKO · 2024-03-23
L
Ignacio Bahamondes
SUB · 2022-02-26
W
Brandon Jenkins
KO/TKO · 2021-09-18
L
Kazula Vargas
U-DEC · 2021-04-24
Austin Hubbard147 days out
L
MarQuel Mederos
S-DEC · 2025-03-29
W
Michal Figlak
U-DEC · 2024-04-27
L
Alexander Hernandez
S-DEC · 2024-04-13
L
Kurt Holobaugh
SUB · 2023-08-19
L
Vinc Pichel
U-DEC · 2021-08-21
Why
Claude
Rongzhu
60% · Decision
  • Limited analysis due to API overload
  • Basic statistical comparison applied
  • Conservative confidence rating used
Write-up

Simplified prediction due to API limitations. Basic statistical comparison used.

GPT
Austin Hubbard
65% · Decision
  • Hubbard's 57% striking defense vs. Rongzhu's 44%
  • Positive strike differential for Hubbard (+0.20) vs. negative for Rongzhu (-0.35)
  • Both fighters have low finish rates, favoring a decision
Write-up

Hubbard's superior striking defense and more favorable strike differential suggest he will absorb less damage while maintaining competitive output. Rongzhu is more aggressive but absorbs more strikes than he lands, and Hubbard's takedown defense should limit Rongzhu's wrestling success. Both have low finishing rates, making a decision outcome likely.