Fight Genie logo Fight Genie
Back
UFC Fight Night: Tsarukyan vs. HookerMiddleweightPrelims
Ismail NaurdievWINNER
Ismail
Naurdiev
2-3UFC
29 yrsElo 1518
VS
Ryan Loder
Ryan
Loder
1-1UFC
34 yrsElo 1474*
Final: Ismail Naurdiev by KO/TKO Punch
Who wins
Claude
72%
Loder
GPT
78%
Loder
Elo
56%
Naurdiev
1518 vs 1474
Tale of the tapeUFC averages
5'10" Height 6'2"
74" Reach 76"
Orthodox Stance Southpaw
3.17 Landed / min 6.16
1.30 Absorbed / minlower better 0.15
52% Strike accuracy 80%
68% Strike defense 50%
1.25 Takedowns / 15 2.20
71% TD accuracy 33%
70% TD defense 100%
0.2 Subs / 15 2.2
Small sample: Ryan Loder, 2 UFC fights.
How it ends
Claude: KO/TKO 55%Claude: Submission 15%Claude: Decision 30%
55%KO/TKO
Claude calls KO/TKO, Round 2
KO/TKO 55%Submission 15%Decision 30%
GPT: KO/TKO 10%GPT: Submission 55%GPT: Decision 35%
55%Submission
GPT calls Submission
KO/TKO 10%Submission 55%Decision 35%
Formnewest first
Ismail Naurdiev154 days out
L
JunYong Park
U-DEC · 2025-06-21
L
Sean Brady
U-DEC · 2020-02-29
W
Siyar Bahadurzada
U-DEC · 2019-09-28
L
Chance Rencountre
U-DEC · 2019-07-06
W
Michel Prazeres
U-DEC · 2019-02-23
Ryan Loder203 days out
L
Azamat Bekoev
KO/TKO Punch · 2025-05-03
W
Robert Valentin
KO/TKO · 2024-03-16
Why
Claude
Ryan Loder
72% · KO/TKO
  • Loder's 80% striking accuracy vs Naurdiev's 52% represents a massive technical gap
  • 6.16 to 3.17 SLPM advantage for Loder indicates he'll overwhelm with volume
  • Loder's recent KO wins show finishing power; Naurdiev has 68% striking defense vulnerability
  • Nearly 5-year layoff for Naurdiev (last fought 2020) suggests significant ring rust
Write-up

Loder's striking metrics are exceptional - 80% accuracy with 6.16 strikes landed per minute and a +6.01 differential. His recent KO victories demonstrate finishing power at middleweight. Naurdiev's 52% accuracy and lower volume (3.17 SLPM) combined with just 68% striking defense makes him vulnerable to Loder's precise, high-volume attack. The southpaw vs orthodox matchup favors Loder's power shots. Naurdiev hasn't competed since 2020 and was primarily a welterweight, suggesting ring rust and size disadvantages. Loder's 100% takedown defense neutralizes Naurdiev's wrestling threat.

GPT
Ryan Loder
78% · Submission
  • Massive striking differential and accuracy advantage for Loder
  • Superior grappling output and submission threat from Loder
  • Perfect takedown defense and significant physical advantages for Loder
Write-up

Loder's statistical profile is dominant across key areas: he lands strikes at nearly double the rate of Naurdiev with vastly higher accuracy (80% vs 52%), absorbs almost no damage (SApM 0.15 vs 1.3), and boasts a perfect 100% takedown defense. Critically, his submission average (2.2 per fight) far exceeds Naurdiev's (0.2), and Naurdiev has shown only average takedown defense (70%). Loder's physical advantages and southpaw stance further complicate the matchup for Naurdiev, who has not demonstrated equivalent finishing ability or offensive output.