Fight Genie logo Fight Genie
Back
UFC Fight Night: Royval vs. KapeWomen's StrawweightPrelims
Amanda Lemos
Amanda
Lemos
9-5UFC
38 yrsElo 1565
VS
Gillian Robertson
Gillian
Robertson
12-7UFC
30 yrsElo 1569
Who wins
Claude
64%
Robertson
GPT
69%
Lemos
Elo
51%
Robertson
1565 vs 1569
Tale of the tapeUFC averages
5'4" Height 5'5"
65" Reach 63"
Southpaw Stance Orthodox
2.84 Landed / min 2.71
3.22 Absorbed / minlower better 2.86
55% Strike accuracy 48%
44% Strike defense 56%
0.93 Takedowns / 15 2.76
57% TD accuracy 40%
63% TD defense 38%
0.7 Subs / 15 0.9
How it ends
Claude: KO/TKO 20%Claude: Submission 45%Claude: Decision 35%
45%Submission
Claude calls Submission, Round 3
KO/TKO 20%Submission 45%Decision 35%
GPT: KO/TKO 47%GPT: Submission 8%GPT: Decision 45%
47%KO/TKO
GPT calls KO/TKO
KO/TKO 47%Submission 8%Decision 45%
Formnewest first
Amanda Lemos91 days out
L
Tatiana Suarez
U-DEC · 2025-09-13
W
Iasmin Lucindo
U-DEC · 2025-03-08
W
Mackenzie Dern
U-DEC · 2024-02-17
L
Virna Jandiroba
SUB · 2024-02-10
L
Zhang Weili
U-DEC · 2023-08-19
Gillian Robertson224 days out
W
Marina Rodriguez
KO/TKO Punches · 2025-05-03
L
win
· 2024-11-09
W
Michelle Waterson-Gomez
U-DEC · 2024-01-27
W
Polyana Viana
KO/TKO · 2024-01-20
L
Tabatha Ricci
U-DEC · 2023-06-24
Why
Claude
Gillian Robertson
64% · Submission
  • Robertson averages 2.48 takedowns vs Lemos' 61% TDD suggests multiple successful takedowns
  • Lemos submitted twice in last 5 fights shows grappling vulnerability
  • Robertson's 1.1 submission attempts per fight vs Lemos' defensive gaps
  • 12% striking defense advantage for Robertson minimizes Lemos' power threat
Write-up

Robertson's superior grappling metrics (2.48 TDAvg vs 0.9, 1.1 SubAvg vs 0.8) and Lemos' vulnerability to submissions (2 sub losses in last 5) create a clear path to victory. While Lemos has better striking accuracy (54% vs 48%), Robertson's improved striking defense (56% vs 44%) and consistent takedown pressure should allow her to weather early exchanges and impose her grappling. Lemos' 61% TDD is concerning against Robertson's relentless wrestling approach.

GPT
Amanda Lemos
69% · KO/TKO
  • Significant striking power and accuracy edge for Lemos, with much more one-shot finishing ability than Robertson
  • Robertson's takedown game (2.48 TDs per 15, 42% accuracy) must carry the fight, but she faces a physically strong opponent with 63% TD accuracy and 61% TD defense who is hard to hold down
  • On extended standing exchanges, Lemos' offensive potency versus Robertson's historically weaker defensive wrestling and striking durability creates high KO/TKO upside
Write-up

Lemos is the far more dangerous and explosive striker with superior power and 54% accuracy, while Robertson is hittable on the feet and heavily reliant on volume takedowns against a physically stronger opponent with solid 63% offensive wrestling and serviceable 61% takedown defense. Robertson's path is clearly grappling-based, but her 42% TD accuracy and historically porous TD defense suggest she will struggle to get consistent, clean entries without eating big counters. Over three rounds, the most likely dynamic is Robertson attempting to force clinches and shots, getting stalled or punished, and Lemos landing the far more damaging strikes, with a high chance of a knockdown or ground-and-pound finish once Robertson slows or gets stuck on the end of Lemos' power shots.