Fight Genie logo Fight Genie
Back
UFC Fight Night: Nurmagomedov vs. SongBantamweightMain card
Umar Nurmagomedov
Umar
Nurmagomedov
8-1UFC
30 yrsElo 1634
VS
Song YadongWINNER
Song
Yadong
12-5UFC
28 yrsElo 1635
Final: Song Yadong by KO/TKO Punch
Who wins
Claude
76%
Nurmagomedov
GPT
76%
Nurmagomedov
Elo
50%
Nurmagomedov
1634 vs 1635
Tale of the tapeUFC averages
5'8" Height 5'8"
69" Reach 67"
Orthodox Stance Orthodox
3.86 Landed / min 4.34
1.86 Absorbed / minlower better 3.81
56% Strike accuracy 43%
61% Strike defense 55%
4.03 Takedowns / 15 0.82
46% TD accuracy 41%
79% TD defense 73%
0.2 Subs / 15 0.2
How it ends
Claude: KO/TKO 10%Claude: Submission 15%Claude: Decision 75%
75%Decision
Claude calls Decision
KO/TKO 10%Submission 15%Decision 75%
GPT: KO/TKO 14%GPT: Submission 16%GPT: Decision 70%
70%Decision
GPT calls Decision
KO/TKO 14%Submission 16%Decision 70%
Formnewest first
Umar Nurmagomedov216 days out
W
Deiveson Figueiredo
U-DEC · 2026-01-24
W
Mario Bautista
U-DEC · 2025-10-25
L
Merab Dvalishvili
U-DEC · 2025-01-18
W
Bekzat Almakhan
U-DEC · 2024-03-02
W
Cory Sandhagen
U-DEC · 2024-02-24
Song Yadong91 days out
W
Deiveson Figueiredo
SUB Guillotine Choke · 2026-05-30
L
Sean O'Malley
U-DEC · 2026-01-24
W
Henry Cejudo
U-DEC · 2025-02-22
L
Petr Yan
U-DEC · 2024-03-09
W
Chris Gutierrez
U-DEC · 2023-12-09
Why
Claude
Umar Nurmagomedov
76% · Decision
  • Common opponents: Umar 4-0 (beat Sandhagen, Figueiredo) vs Song 1-3 against the same pool, Song was KO'd by Sandhagen, whom Umar shut out
  • Grappling mismatch: 4.03 TD/fight at 46% accuracy against a Song TDD (73%) that failed against Yan and elite pressure wrestlers
  • Defensive gulf: Umar absorbs 1.86 SApM with 61% defense vs Song's 3.81 SApM absorbed, Song loses the striking math even in his best phase
  • Umar's 100% decision rate in his last five caps finish equity but makes the distance/decision outcome highly bankable
Write-up

The market (-520, 79% de-vigged) and Elo (54%) disagree sharply here, and the truth sits closer to the market. Elo underrates Umar because his 10-fight UFC sample is short but loaded with elite names, and his lone loss came in a competitive five-rounder against Merab Dvalishvili, the best bantamweight alive. The common-opponent ledger is damning for Song: Umar went 4-0 against shared opposition including a clean decision over Cory Sandhagen, whom Song was stopped by, and both beat Figueiredo. Statistically the fight is lopsided in the phases that matter: Umar absorbs just 1.86 SApM against Song's 3.81, lands at 56% accuracy versus Song's 43%, and averages 4.03 takedowns per fight against a 73% takedown defense that has cracked against elite chain-wrestlers (Merab, Yan both grounded Song). Song's path is a single counter right hand or check hook in scrambles, real but narrow, and Umar's 61% striking defense and low-exposure southpaw-style karate movement minimize those windows. Umar's 0% finish rate over his last five signals how this ends: five rounds of takedowns, back-takes, and point-heavy kickboxing. The 211-day layoff is routine for him (career average 221 days between fights). Umar by wide decision, with a late submission as the live secondary outcome if Song fades chasing the fight.

GPT
Umar Nurmagomedov
76% · Decision
  • Nurmagomedov lands with 56% accuracy while absorbing only 1.86 significant strikes per minute
  • Nurmagomedov averages 4.03 takedowns per fight, creating a major grappling-volume advantage
  • Nurmagomedov has performed better against common opponents, including a win over Cory Sandhagen
Write-up

Nurmagomedov's superior defensive striking, accuracy, and high-frequency wrestling should allow him to dictate range and control extended portions of the fight. He absorbs only 1.86 significant strikes per minute compared with Song's 3.81 and owns a much stronger striking differential of +2.00 versus +0.53. Song's 73% takedown defense and dangerous boxing should make the exchanges competitive, but Nurmagomedov's 4.03 takedowns per fight, layered entries, and ability to mix kicks with grappling project as the more reliable five-round approach.