Fight Genie logo Fight Genie
Back to the card

Mario Pinto vs Ryan Spann

Heavyweight · Prelims · UFC Fight Night: Hooker vs. Parnasse

FINAL: Mario Pinto by KO/TKO Punches
Mario Pinto
Mario Pinto
Age 28 · Elo 1575*
WW
329 days since last fight
vs
Ryan Spann
Ryan Spann
Age 35 · Elo 1561
WWLWL
133 days since last fight

Who wins, by source

Mario PintoRyan Spann
Claude Claude: Mario Pinto 66% Claude: Ryan Spann 34% 66% 34% GPT GPT: Mario Pinto 70% GPT: Ryan Spann 30% 70% 30% Market Market: Mario Pinto 71% Market: Ryan Spann 29% 71% 29% Elo Elo: Mario Pinto 52% Elo: Ryan Spann 48% 52% 48%

Each row splits one source's view of the fight. The dashed line is even odds. Where the models sit further from the market, they are claiming an edge.

Tale of the tape

Mario PintoRyan Spann
Strikes landed / min Mario Pinto Strikes landed / min: 2.85 2.85 Ryan Spann Strikes landed / min: 3.11 3.11 Strikes absorbed / min Mario Pinto Strikes absorbed / min: 1.93 1.93 Ryan Spann Strikes absorbed / min: 3.92 3.92 Striking accuracy Mario Pinto Striking accuracy: 69% 69% Ryan Spann Striking accuracy: 39% 39% Striking defense Mario Pinto Striking defense: 58% 58% Ryan Spann Striking defense: 43% 43% Takedowns / 15 min Mario Pinto Takedowns / 15 min: 2.38 2.38 Ryan Spann Takedowns / 15 min: 1.21 1.21 Takedown defense Mario Pinto Takedown defense: 100% 100% Ryan Spann Takedown defense: 59% 59% Sub attempts / 15 min Mario Pinto Sub attempts / 15 min: 0.9 0.9 Ryan Spann Sub attempts / 15 min: 1.7 1.7

Career UFC averages. Bars are scaled within each row, so compare left against right, not row against row. The stronger side is highlighted, and for strikes absorbed the lower number is the better one.

How it ends

KO/TKOSubmissionDecision
Claude Claude: KO/TKO 58% 58% Claude: Submission 7% Claude: Decision 35% 35%GPT GPT: KO/TKO 58% 58% GPT: Submission 17% 17% GPT: Decision 25% 25%

Each model's split across the ways this fight can finish, out of 100.

The analysis

Claude
Mario Pinto by KO/TKO, 66% confidence

This is a genuine market-vs-Elo tension: the book prices Pinto at 71% while opponent-adjusted Elo gives Spann 54%. I side closer to the market than Elo here, because Pinto's rating is provisional (2 rated fights) and structurally lags a 12-0 fighter on a steep upward trend (+49), while Spann's 1577 is inflated by light-heavyweight work and his heavyweight wins came against Buchecha (grappler with no striking) and Brzeski (bottom-tier). The decisive variable is Spann's chin and fight IQ under fire - he's been stopped by punches by Guskov and Cortes Acosta in his last four losses, and Cortes Acosta is a far less dynamic striker than Pinto, who owns a 69% strike accuracy and +0.92 differential with KOs of Diniz and Lane. Pinto is 7 years younger, matches Spann's exact frame (6'5", 79" reach), and has shown 100% takedown defense, neutralizing Spann's guillotine-hunting fallback. Spann's live path is his 1st-round submission opportunism if Pinto overcommits early, which keeps this from being a lock, but the base case is Pinto walking Spann down and finding the chin by round 2 or 3.

GPT
Mario Pinto by KO/TKO, 70% confidence

Pinto projects as the more efficient and defensively reliable fighter. He lands with 69% accuracy, maintains a +0.92 striking differential, and absorbs 1.93 significant strikes per minute, while Spann has a -0.81 differential and absorbs 3.92 per minute with only 43% striking defense. Spann remains dangerous early through power and submissions, but Pinto's reported 100% takedown defense should help keep the fight in his preferred phase. If Pinto survives Spann's initial burst, his cleaner offense and Spann's defensive liabilities create a strong likelihood of a second-round stoppage.