Kurtis Campbell vs Trevor Peek

Each row splits one source's view of the fight. The dashed line is even odds. Where the models sit further from the market, they are claiming an edge.

Career UFC averages. Bars are scaled within each row, so compare left against right, not row against row. The stronger side is highlighted, and for strikes absorbed the lower number is the better one.

Each model's split across the ways this fight can finish, out of 100.

The market's -370 on Campbell despite his KO loss to Danny Silva in his debut tells you how the books view Peek's current state: a 722-day layoff, a two-fight losing skid, and a drop from lightweight to featherweight at age 31 after a career of brawling decisions. Peek's style - wild, chin-out pressure with a 43% striking defense - is entertaining but has now lost him three of four, all decisions where more technical opponents (Mariscal, Ashmouz, Charlie Campbell) out-craft him. Kurtis Campbell, 24 and a 100% finisher outside the UFC with a DWCS knee KO, is precisely that more technical archetype, with the added dimension of a heavy takedown game (8.76 attempts per 15 in his limited data). Campbell can either counter Peek's lunging hooks or simply wrestle him against a 52% takedown defense. The risks are real: Campbell's chin was just cracked by Silva and Peek carries genuine one-punch power (Gonzalez KO), so this is a live-dog scenario in the opening exchanges. But Peek's first featherweight cut after two years away is a significant physical unknown, and his cardio historically fades late. Confidence capped per debutant-level UFC data on Campbell.

Campbell's major advantage is his wrestling volume, averaging 8.76 takedowns against Peek's modest 52% takedown defense. Peek is the more active and accurate striker, but his 43% striking defense and aggressive style create openings for level changes and prolonged control. Campbell's positive striking differential and lower absorption rate should help him survive exchanges and repeatedly redirect the fight to the ground, producing a control-heavy decision.