Back
WINNER
UFC Fight Night: Garcia vs. OnamaWelterweightPrelims
Charles
Radtke
2-3UFC
VS
Daniel
Frunza
0-1UFC
Final: Charles Radtke by SUB Rear Naked Choke
Who wins
Radtke winsevenFrunza wins
Elo 59% Radtke
Claude 62% Radtke
GPT 67% Radtke
Claude
62%
Radtke
GPT
67%
Radtke
Elo
59%
Radtke
1508 vs 1448
Tale of the tapeUFC averages
5'9"
Height
6'1"
72"
Reach
73"
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
3.38
Landed / min
3.25
3.03
Absorbed / minlower better
4.32
53%
Strike accuracy
38%
56%
Strike defense
50%
0.59
Takedowns / 15
0.00
12%
TD accuracy
0%
100%
TD defense
50%
n/a
Subs / 15
0.0
Small sample: Daniel Frunza, 1 UFC fight.
How it ends
64%Decision
Claude calls Decision
KO/TKO 28%Submission 8%Decision 64%
77%Decision
GPT calls Decision
KO/TKO 18%Submission 5%Decision 77%
Formnewest first
Charles Radtke175 days out
L
Mike Malott
KO/TKO Punch · 2025-05-10
L
win
· 2024-11-09
W
Gilbert Urbina
KO/TKO · 2024-02-03
L
Carlos Prates
KO/TKO · 2024-01-06
W
Blood Diamond
U-DEC · 2023-09-09
Daniel Frunza210 days out
L
Rhys McKee
KO/TKO · 2025-04-05
Why
Claude
Charles Radtke
62% · Decision
- Radtke's 9% striking accuracy advantage creates cleaner landing opportunities
- Perfect takedown defense (100%) negates Frunza's limited grappling threats
- Frunza's -0.59 striking differential suggests he gets hit more than he lands
- Height disadvantage (5'9" vs 6'1") mitigated by Radtke's orthodox counter-striking
Write-up
Radtke's superior striking accuracy (53% vs 44%) and defensive wrestling (100% TDD) should neutralize Frunza's volume-heavy approach. While Frunza throws more (4.94 SLPM vs 3.38), his poor accuracy and worse defense (51% vs 56%) create openings for Radtke's more measured counter-striking. Radtke's recent KO win shows improved finishing ability, though his chin remains suspect after back-to-back KO losses.
GPT
Charles Radtke
67% · Decision
- Radtke's higher striking accuracy and defense
- Frunza's negative strike differential and high SApM
- Radtke's 100% takedown defense neutralizes grappling threats
Write-up
Radtke's superior striking accuracy (53% vs 44%), lower strikes absorbed per minute, and perfect takedown defense give him a technical edge over Frunza, who allows more damage than he delivers and has a negative strike differential. Frunza's higher output is offset by poorer defensive metrics and lack of grappling offense.