Charles Radtke vs Daniel Frunza

Each row splits one source's view of the fight. The dashed line is even odds. Where the models sit further from the market, they are claiming an edge.

Career UFC averages. Bars are scaled within each row, so compare left against right, not row against row. The stronger side is highlighted, and for strikes absorbed the lower number is the better one.

Each model's split across the ways this fight can finish, out of 100.

Radtke's superior striking accuracy (53% vs 44%) and defensive wrestling (100% TDD) should neutralize Frunza's volume-heavy approach. While Frunza throws more (4.94 SLPM vs 3.38), his poor accuracy and worse defense (51% vs 56%) create openings for Radtke's more measured counter-striking. Radtke's recent KO win shows improved finishing ability, though his chin remains suspect after back-to-back KO losses.

Radtke's superior striking accuracy (53% vs 44%), lower strikes absorbed per minute, and perfect takedown defense give him a technical edge over Frunza, who allows more damage than he delivers and has a negative strike differential. Frunza's higher output is offset by poorer defensive metrics and lack of grappling offense.