Gilbert Burns vs Michael Morales
Welterweight · Main card · UFC Fight Night: Burns vs. Morales
Who wins, by source
Each row splits one source's view of the fight. The dashed line is even odds. Where the models sit further from the market, they are claiming an edge.
Tale of the tape
Career UFC averages. Bars are scaled within each row, so compare left against right, not row against row. The stronger side is highlighted, and for strikes absorbed the lower number is the better one.
How it ends
Each model's split across the ways this fight can finish, out of 100.
The analysis
Morales presents a significant stylistic challenge for Burns at this stage of Burns' career. The Brazilian is on a concerning four-fight losing streak, including a devastating KO loss to Jack Della Maddalena. Morales brings superior volume striking (5.42 vs 3.17 SLPM), exceptional takedown defense (92%), and a significant 8-inch reach advantage. Burns' grappling advantage is neutralized by Morales' takedown defense, while standing, Morales' 2.0 strike differential advantage and Burns' declining durability create a perfect storm. Burns' recent performances show diminished punch resistance, while Morales is undefeated with 3 UFC KO/TKO wins and excellent distance management. The 13-year age gap further compounds Burns' disadvantages in this matchup.
Given the statistics provided, Morales shows a higher significant strike rate and volume, as well as a superior takedown defense. Although Burns has a higher takedown average, Morales' defense could potentially neutralize this advantage. The physical advantage also leans towards Morales.