Fight Genie logo Fight Genie
Back to the card

Hyder Amil vs Jamall Emmers

Featherweight · Prelims · UFC Fight Night: Bonfim vs. Brown

FINAL: Jamall Emmers by U-DEC
Hyder Amil
Hyder Amil
Age 35 · Elo 1518
LWWW
133 days since last fight
vs
Jamall Emmers
Jamall Emmers
Age 36 · Elo 1525
WLWLW
224 days since last fight

Who wins, by source

Hyder AmilJamall Emmers
Claude Claude: Hyder Amil 72% Claude: Jamall Emmers 28% 72% 28% GPT GPT: Hyder Amil 67% GPT: Jamall Emmers 33% 67% 33% Elo Elo: Hyder Amil 49% Elo: Jamall Emmers 51% 49% 51%

Each row splits one source's view of the fight. The dashed line is even odds. Where the models sit further from the market, they are claiming an edge.

Tale of the tape

Hyder AmilJamall Emmers
Strikes landed / min Hyder Amil Strikes landed / min: 6.31 6.31 Jamall Emmers Strikes landed / min: 5.30 5.30 Strikes absorbed / min Hyder Amil Strikes absorbed / min: 2.23 2.23 Jamall Emmers Strikes absorbed / min: 4.05 4.05 Striking accuracy Hyder Amil Striking accuracy: 57% 57% Jamall Emmers Striking accuracy: 48% 48% Striking defense Hyder Amil Striking defense: 61% 61% Jamall Emmers Striking defense: 57% 57% Takedowns / 15 min Hyder Amil Takedowns / 15 min: 0.64 0.64 Jamall Emmers Takedowns / 15 min: 1.83 1.83 Takedown defense Hyder Amil Takedown defense: 78% 78% Jamall Emmers Takedown defense: 90% 90% Sub attempts / 15 min Hyder Amil Sub attempts / 15 min: 1.9 1.9 Jamall Emmers Sub attempts / 15 min: 0.2 0.2

Career UFC averages. Bars are scaled within each row, so compare left against right, not row against row. The stronger side is highlighted, and for strikes absorbed the lower number is the better one.

How it ends

KO/TKOSubmissionDecision
Claude Claude: KO/TKO 40% 40% Claude: Submission 15% 15% Claude: Decision 45% 45%GPT GPT: KO/TKO 15% 15% GPT: Submission 12% 12% GPT: Decision 73% 73%

Each model's split across the ways this fight can finish, out of 100.

The analysis

Claude
Hyder Amil by Decision, 72% confidence

Amil's perfect 3-0 record with all KO/TKO victories showcases elite finishing ability. His superior striking volume (6.31 vs 5.30 SLPM) and accuracy (57% vs 48%) create consistent offensive pressure. Emmers' recent loss via KO/TKO and mixed 2-3 record over his last 5 fights indicates vulnerability. Amil's 1.9 submission average adds a grappling threat that Emmers must respect, opening up striking opportunities.

GPT
Hyder Amil by Decision, 67% confidence

Amil's high striking output and superior striking accuracy (57% vs. 48%) along with a strong striking differential (+4.08) give him a clear edge on the feet. Emmers has better takedown volume and accuracy, but Amil's solid takedown defense (78%) and Emmers' low submission threat (0.2 per fight) minimize the risk on the ground. Despite Emmers' experience and high takedown defense, Amil's pace and defensive metrics should allow him to outpoint Emmers over three rounds.