Fight Genie logo Fight Genie
Back
UFC Fight Night: Bonfim vs. BrownFeatherweightPrelims
Hyder Amil
Hyder
Amil
3-1UFC
35 yrsElo 1518
VS
Jamall EmmersWINNER
Jamall
Emmers
4-4UFC
36 yrsElo 1525
Final: Jamall Emmers by U-DEC
Who wins
Claude
72%
Amil
GPT
67%
Amil
Elo
51%
Emmers
1518 vs 1525
Tale of the tapeUFC averages
5'9" Height 5'10"
70" Reach 74"
Switch Stance Orthodox
6.31 Landed / min 5.30
2.23 Absorbed / minlower better 4.05
57% Strike accuracy 48%
61% Strike defense 57%
0.64 Takedowns / 15 1.83
33% TD accuracy 40%
78% TD defense 90%
1.9 Subs / 15 0.2
How it ends
Claude: KO/TKO 40%Claude: Submission 15%Claude: Decision 45%
45%Decision
Claude calls Decision
KO/TKO 40%Submission 15%Decision 45%
GPT: KO/TKO 15%GPT: Submission 12%GPT: Decision 73%
73%Decision
GPT calls Decision
KO/TKO 15%Submission 12%Decision 73%
Formnewest first
Hyder Amil133 days out
L
Jose Delgado
KO/TKO Knee · 2025-06-28
W
William Gomis
S-DEC · 2025-03-01
W
Fernie Garcia
KO/TKO · 2024-02-10
W
JeongYeong Lee
KO/TKO · 2024-02-10
Jamall Emmers224 days out
W
Gabriel Miranda
KO/TKO Punch · 2025-03-29
L
Nate Landwehr
KO/TKO · 2024-03-30
W
Dennis Buzukja
KO/TKO · 2023-11-11
L
Jack Jenkins
S-DEC · 2023-06-24
W
Khusein Askhabov
U-DEC · 2023-02-18
Why
Claude
Hyder Amil
72% · Decision
  • Amil's 100% finish rate with 3 consecutive KO victories demonstrates elite power
  • 9% striking accuracy advantage (57% vs 48%) ensures cleaner connections
  • Emmers' 4-inch reach advantage partially negated by Amil's switch stance versatility
  • Amil's 1.9 submission average forces Emmers to defend multiple threats
Write-up

Amil's perfect 3-0 record with all KO/TKO victories showcases elite finishing ability. His superior striking volume (6.31 vs 5.30 SLPM) and accuracy (57% vs 48%) create consistent offensive pressure. Emmers' recent loss via KO/TKO and mixed 2-3 record over his last 5 fights indicates vulnerability. Amil's 1.9 submission average adds a grappling threat that Emmers must respect, opening up striking opportunities.

GPT
Hyder Amil
67% · Decision
  • Amil's significant striking differential (+4.08 vs. +1.25)
  • Higher striking accuracy and defense
  • Emmers' low submission average and relative lack of finishing threat
Write-up

Amil's high striking output and superior striking accuracy (57% vs. 48%) along with a strong striking differential (+4.08) give him a clear edge on the feet. Emmers has better takedown volume and accuracy, but Amil's solid takedown defense (78%) and Emmers' low submission threat (0.2 per fight) minimize the risk on the ground. Despite Emmers' experience and high takedown defense, Amil's pace and defensive metrics should allow him to outpoint Emmers over three rounds.