- Sharaf has been finished by punches in Round 2 in both UFC appearances and absorbs 15.0 SApM against 7.41 SLPM (-7.59 differential)
- Steveson's Olympic-level wrestling matches up against a Sharaf who is 1-for-9 on takedowns and has not stopped a single attempt in the UFC
- 267-day layoff for Sharaf following a KO loss is a durability red flag at heavyweight
- Steveson data is single-fight/debut-quality: 16.29 SLPM and 71% accuracy are a one-bout snapshot, so confidence is capped at 65 despite a -1800 line
Write-up
The data pipeline flags Steveson as having no completed UFC fights on record, while the enrichment log shows a KO win over Elisha Ellison at UFC 329 (Jul. 2026). Either way, the UFCStats per-minute numbers (16.29 SLPM, 71% accuracy) come from at most one bout and the 0% TD figures are empty fields, not skills, so this read leans on the -1800 market line, Steveson's Olympic gold-medal wrestling pedigree, and the 4-0 regional/UFC record with 100% finish rate. Sharaf is the more useful sample: both of his UFC bouts ended in Round 2 KO losses (Tafa, Asplund), he absorbs 15 strikes per minute against 7.41 landed (a -7.59 differential), and he has landed 1 of 9 takedown attempts while defending none. He returns off a 267-day layoff following a knockout, which historically compounds durability concerns at heavyweight. Sharaf's 6'3"/77" frame gives him 4 inches of height and 3 inches of reach, but Steveson's entries come from a chain-wrestling base that does not need to win the jab exchange. Expect an early takedown, top-position ground strikes, and a stoppage before the midpoint of the fight. Confidence is capped at 65 because of the debut/small-sample flag; the market's 90% is likely closer to correct, but the model cannot verify it from the available UFC data.
- Steveson lands 16.29 significant strikes per minute versus Sharaf's 7.41.
- Steveson holds advantages in striking accuracy (71% versus 43%) and defense (60% versus 42%).
- Sharaf's 11% takedown accuracy provides limited evidence of a reliable grappling fallback.
Write-up
Steveson's higher striking output and accuracy match favorably against Sharaf's 15 significant strikes absorbed per minute and 42% striking defense, supporting an early stoppage. Sharaf's height and reach advantages offer some resistance. Missing sample sizes and incomplete grappling data limit confidence. Method percentages are conditional on a Steveson win.