Fight Genie logo Fight Genie
Back
UFC 326: Holloway vs. Oliveira 2BantamweightPrelims
Cody GarbrandtWINNER
Cody
Garbrandt
9-7UFC
34 yrsElo 1574
VS
Xiao Long
Xiao
Long
1-2UFC
27 yrsElo 1444
Final: Cody Garbrandt by U-DEC
Who wins
Claude
63%
Long
GPT
68%
Long
Elo
68%
Garbrandt
1574 vs 1444
Tale of the tapeUFC averages
5'8" Height 5'8"
65" Reach 70"
Orthodox Stance Orthodox
2.82 Landed / min 5.06
3.69 Absorbed / minlower better 3.85
40% Strike accuracy 47%
58% Strike defense 50%
0.84 Takedowns / 15 0.74
22% TD accuracy 27%
81% TD defense 82%
0.0 Subs / 15 n/a
How it ends
Claude: KO/TKO 25%Claude: Submission 10%Claude: Decision 65%
65%Decision
Claude calls Decision
KO/TKO 25%Submission 10%Decision 65%
GPT: KO/TKO 32%GPT: Submission 3%GPT: Decision 65%
65%Decision
GPT calls Decision
KO/TKO 32%Submission 3%Decision 65%
Formnewest first
Cody Garbrandt266 days out
L
Raoni Barcelos
U-DEC · 2025-06-14
L
Deiveson Figueiredo
SUB · 2024-04-13
W
Brian Kelleher
KO/TKO · 2023-12-16
W
Trevin Jones
U-DEC · 2023-03-04
L
Kai Kara-France
KO/TKO · 2021-12-11
Xiao Long196 days out
L
SuYoung You
U-DEC · 2025-08-23
W
Quang Le
· 2024-11-23
L
ChangHo Lee
S-DEC · 2024-01-20
Why
Claude
Xiao Long
63% · Decision
  • Xiao Long's 67% higher striking volume creates consistent pressure
  • 5-inch reach advantage for Long despite same height controls distance
  • Garbrandt's 3 losses in last 5 fights show clear decline pattern
  • Long's superior striking defense (48% vs 40% offensive accuracy) limits Garbrandt's power shots
Write-up

Garbrandt's decline is evident with 3 losses in his last 5 fights, including being finished twice. Xiao Long's superior striking volume (4.98 vs 2.98 SLPM) and better accuracy (52% vs 40%) create a significant output advantage. Long's 5-inch reach advantage despite same height allows him to control range against the aggressive Garbrandt. Cody's chin deterioration shown in recent KO loss to Kara-France and submission to Figueiredo suggests vulnerability. Long's youth (26 vs 34) and fresher chin should allow him to weather early storms and take over.

GPT
Xiao Long
68% · Decision
  • Xiao Long's superior volume and accuracy (4.98 SLpM, 52% accuracy) versus Garbrandt's 2.98 SLpM and 40% accuracy
  • Positive striking differential for Xiao Long (+0.96) versus negative for Garbrandt (-0.78), indicating Xiao Long wins minutes more consistently
  • Reach advantage for Xiao Long (-5 for Garbrandt) favors Xiao's outside boxing and jab in a largely striking-centric matchup
  • Comparable takedown averages and strong TD defense on both sides (80% for Garbrandt, 78% for Xiao) reduce likelihood of prolonged grappling, emphasizing striking numbers
  • Garbrandt's historical chin concerns and defensive lapses under pressure versus Xiao's offensive pace increase variance but still favor Xiao over three rounds
Write-up

Xiao Long's significantly higher striking volume and accuracy (4.98 SLpM at 52%) combined with a positive striking differential give him a strong statistical edge over Garbrandt, whose numbers show a negative differential and lower output. Garbrandt still has elite speed and power, but his durability and tendency to get drawn into exchanges against a higher-volume striker with a 5-inch reach advantage create risk over three rounds. Both have solid takedown defense, suggesting a largely stand-up fight where Xiao Long's activity and accuracy are more likely to sway the judges, while Garbrandt's best path is a counter KO that is less reliable over time.