- Finney's 0% takedown defense vs Malkoun's 6.62 takedowns per fight average
- Malkoun's recent KO win showing evolved striking capabilities
- 56% striking accuracy for Malkoun vs Finney's defensive vulnerabilities
- UFC experience advantage with 5 recent fights vs Finney's debut
Write-up
Malkoun's recent KO victory shows improved striking power, while maintaining his wrestling-heavy approach. Finney's 0% takedown defense is extremely concerning against Malkoun's 6.62 takedowns per fight. Malkoun's superior striking defense (52% vs 50%) and experience in the UFC give him clear paths to victory through either ground control or improved striking.
- Finney's much higher takedown volume and accuracy (10.04 TDs/fight at 69%) vs. Malkoun's 6.62 at 42%, suggesting wrestling initiative advantage
- Malkoun's low takedown defense (20%) likely allowing Finney to dictate where the fight takes place
- Finney's superior striking accuracy (70% vs. 56%) and positive striking differential, giving him the edge in sparse stand-up exchanges
Write-up
Both are wrestle-grapplers, but Finney's numbers indicate a more explosive and efficient takedown game (10.0 TDs/fight at 69% vs. 6.6 at 42%) combined with higher striking accuracy and slightly better strike differential. Malkoun's historically porous takedown defense (20%) suggests he may be forced to work off his back more than usual, limiting his own top-control heavy style. Finney's higher submission rate per fight implies greater finishing threat on the mat, but Malkoun's durability and experience at UFC level make a grinding, control-heavy decision for Finney the most likely outcome.