Tim Elliott vs Edgar Chairez

Each row splits one source's view of the fight. The dashed line is even odds. Where the models sit further from the market, they are claiming an edge.

Career UFC averages. Bars are scaled within each row, so compare left against right, not row against row. The stronger side is highlighted, and for strikes absorbed the lower number is the better one.

Each model's split across the ways this fight can finish, out of 100.

The market's 66% on Chairez feels a touch high given the Elo block calls this a coin flip (51/49), but I still land on the younger fighter for a stylistic reason rather than a form reason. Elliott's game is 3.61 takedowns per 15 minutes at 45% accuracy with a scramble-heavy, neck-exposing style that has produced both his best wins (guillotine over Asakura, arm triangle over Sumudaerji) and his worst losses (arm triangle to Mokaev). Chairez does not shoot at all (0 TD average) but averages 1.4 submission attempts per 15 and has finished Bruno Silva, CJ Vergara, and Lacerda by choke, including a triangle from the bottom. That is the exact matchup: Elliott will get the takedowns because Chairez's 47% TDD will not stop him, but the fight then lives in Chairez's guard, where his long 71-inch frame and active submission game turn Elliott's aggression into openings. Elliott is 39, coming off a decision loss to Erceg 127 days ago, and his 56% striking defense and 3.0 absorbed per minute are fine, but Chairez's 4.71 absorbed with 46% defense means Elliott will land on the feet - the upset path is Elliott piling up strikes and top control for a decision if he stays disciplined about posture. Elliott's momentum in his last three (beating Asakura, losing to Erceg) shows he is still a real flyweight; this is not a fade of his ability but a bet on where the fight is contested. Chairez's 3-fight win streak includes a split decision over Bunes, so I am not treating him as a clear step above.

Elliott has the stronger statistical foundation for a wrestling-led decision: 3.61 takedowns per 15 minutes against Chairez's 47% takedown defense, plus a +0.51 significant-strike differential versus Chairez's -0.95. Repeated entries and effective offense from top position could reduce Chairez's opportunities at distance. Chairez's listed reach advantage and 1.4 submission attempts per 15 minutes create meaningful counters, particularly during entries and scrambles. Missing recent-form information and apparent placeholder zeros limit confidence. This prediction assumes a three-round fight; method percentages are conditional on an Elliott victory.