David Martinez vs Dan Ige

Each row splits one source's view of the fight. The dashed line is even odds. Where the models sit further from the market, they are claiming an edge.

Career UFC averages. Bars are scaled within each row, so compare left against right, not row against row. The stronger side is highlighted, and for strikes absorbed the lower number is the better one.

Each model's split across the ways this fight can finish, out of 100.

This is Ige's first attempt at 135 lbs at age 35 after 30 pro fights at featherweight, and that cut is the single most important variable. His last two outings were a decision loss to Pitbull and a first-round spinning-back-kick KO loss to Melquizael Costa, so he arrives 1-4 in his last five and dropping a division to reset. Martinez, by contrast, has beaten Marlon Vera and Rob Font back-to-back by clean decisions, and the profile behind those wins is defensive: 69% striking defense, 2.9 absorbed per minute, and 100% takedown defense across the small sample. Ige's career output of 3.6 SLpM with only a +0.04 differential means he relies on power and moments rather than volume; Martinez's +1.92 differential says he wins the exchanges Ige needs to steal. The Elo block leans Ige 54/46, but Martinez's rating is provisional after two fights and already sits within 27 points despite the tiny sample, so the opponent-adjusted signal actually reads as a rising fighter rather than a warning. I sit slightly under the market's 72% because Ige's durability and short-hook power give him a live KO path if the cut goes well, and because Martinez's two UFC wins were both close-enough decisions rather than dominant. Expect Martinez to control distance with the jab-kick game, deny Ige's occasional takedown, and take rounds on defensive efficiency.

Conditional on the supplied matchup and a three-round bout, Martinez has the stronger striking profile: 4.82 significant strikes landed per minute versus 3.60, a +1.92 striking differential versus +0.04, and 69% striking defense versus 56%. Those advantages favor Martinez winning exchanges through output and limiting return damage. Ige's listed reach advantage and greater takedown activity offer routes to disrupt that rhythm, although his 26% takedown accuracy makes sustained wrestling control uncertain. Confidence remains modest because sample sizes, opponent quality, and the weight class are unspecified; Martinez's 100% takedown defense should not be treated as conclusive. Decision is the cautious method choice, not an inference from the zero-filled finish statistics. Method probabilities are conditional on a Martinez victory.