Fight Genie logo Fight Genie
Back
Noche UFC: Rodriguez vs. SilvaBantamweightPrelims
David MartinezWINNER
David
Martinez
2-0UFC
28 yrsElo 1567*
VS
Dan Ige
Dan
Ige
11-8UFC
35 yrsElo 1560
Final: David Martinez by U-DEC
Who wins
Claude
68%
Martinez
GPT
59%
Martinez
Elo
51%
Martinez
1567 vs 1560
Tale of the tapeUFC averages
5'6" Height 5'7"
67" Reach 71"
Orthodox Stance Orthodox
4.82 Landed / min 3.60
2.90 Absorbed / minlower better 3.56
46% Strike accuracy 45%
69% Strike defense 56%
0.60 Takedowns / 15 0.93
25% TD accuracy 26%
100% TD defense 56%
0.0 Subs / 15 0.2
Small sample: David Martinez, 2 UFC fights.
How it ends
Claude: KO/TKO 27%Claude: Submission 5%Claude: Decision 68%
68%Decision
Claude calls Decision
KO/TKO 27%Submission 5%Decision 68%
GPT: KO/TKO 23%GPT: Submission 2%GPT: Decision 75%
75%Decision
GPT calls Decision
KO/TKO 23%Submission 2%Decision 75%
Formnewest first
David Martinez364 days out
W
Rob Font
U-DEC · 2025-09-13
W
Saimon Oliveira
KO/TKO Knee · 2025-03-29
Dan Ige202 days out
L
Melquizael Costa
KO/TKO Spinning Back Kick · 2026-02-21
W
Sean Woodson
KO/TKO Punches · 2025-04-12
W
Andre Fili
KO/TKO · 2024-02-10
L
Diego Lopes
U-DEC · 2024-01-27
L
Bryce Mitchell
U-DEC · 2023-09-23
Why
Claude
David Martinez
68% · Decision
  • Martinez 69% striking defense vs Ige 56%, Ige's career strike differential is essentially zero (+0.04), Martinez's is +1.92
  • Ige's first-ever cut to 135 at age 35 after a 197-day layoff, coming off a Round 1 KO loss
  • Martinez has consecutive decision wins over Vera and Font, higher-quality bantamweight opposition than anything Ige has faced at this weight
  • Ige's 4-inch reach edge (71 vs 67) is offset by Martinez's superior volume (4.82 vs 3.6 SLpM) and 100% TDD nullifying Ige's 0.93 TD/15 attempts
Write-up

This is Ige's first attempt at 135 lbs at age 35 after 30 pro fights at featherweight, and that cut is the single most important variable. His last two outings were a decision loss to Pitbull and a first-round spinning-back-kick KO loss to Melquizael Costa, so he arrives 1-4 in his last five and dropping a division to reset. Martinez, by contrast, has beaten Marlon Vera and Rob Font back-to-back by clean decisions, and the profile behind those wins is defensive: 69% striking defense, 2.9 absorbed per minute, and 100% takedown defense across the small sample. Ige's career output of 3.6 SLpM with only a +0.04 differential means he relies on power and moments rather than volume; Martinez's +1.92 differential says he wins the exchanges Ige needs to steal. The Elo block leans Ige 54/46, but Martinez's rating is provisional after two fights and already sits within 27 points despite the tiny sample, so the opponent-adjusted signal actually reads as a rising fighter rather than a warning. I sit slightly under the market's 72% because Ige's durability and short-hook power give him a live KO path if the cut goes well, and because Martinez's two UFC wins were both close-enough decisions rather than dominant. Expect Martinez to control distance with the jab-kick game, deny Ige's occasional takedown, and take rounds on defensive efficiency.

GPT
David Martinez
59% · Decision
  • Martinez leads significant-strike output by 1.22 landed strikes per minute and absorbs 0.66 fewer per minute.
  • Martinez's superior reported striking defense favors cleaner exchanges, but Ige's listed reach advantage could complicate distance management.
  • Ige has greater takedown activity, while missing sample sizes and an unspecified weight class limit confidence in Martinez's statistical advantages.
Write-up

Conditional on the supplied matchup and a three-round bout, Martinez has the stronger striking profile: 4.82 significant strikes landed per minute versus 3.60, a +1.92 striking differential versus +0.04, and 69% striking defense versus 56%. Those advantages favor Martinez winning exchanges through output and limiting return damage. Ige's listed reach advantage and greater takedown activity offer routes to disrupt that rhythm, although his 26% takedown accuracy makes sustained wrestling control uncertain. Confidence remains modest because sample sizes, opponent quality, and the weight class are unspecified; Martinez's 100% takedown defense should not be treated as conclusive. Decision is the cautious method choice, not an inference from the zero-filled finish statistics. Method probabilities are conditional on a Martinez victory.